Institutional Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Czech Republic by the Constitutional Court and the National Human Rights Institution

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55073/2026.1.243-264

Keywords:

the fundamental rights adjudication, the constitutionality protection, the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic, the National Human Rights Institution (NHRI), the Defender

Abstract

This paper primarily examines the fundamental rights adjudication in the Czech Republic. Article 83 of the Constitution states that the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic is a judicial body for the protection of constitutionality. In the Czech Republic, the concept of constitutionality protection is not expressly defined in the Constitution. It may, however, be understood both as the legal space (range of cases) within which the Constitutional Court operates and as the set of means through which it safeguards the fundamental rights and freedoms of the constitutional law addressees. A somewhat more specific definition is provided by certain theorists who understand the protection of constitutionality as the safeguarding of constitutional rules, principles, and values contained in the constitutional order against the exercise of public power.

As regards the existence of circumstances in the Czech Republic that may affect the effective protection of fundamental rights, it follows from the consistent case-law of the Constitutional Court that the binding nature of its judgements is almost absolute. It should, however, be added that with respect to the so-called precedential binding nature of the Constitutional Court’s judgements, general courts may depart from the legal opinions of the Constitutional Court, provided that they present competing considerations in good faith and thereby initiate a constitutional dialogue with the Constitutional Court.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Carver, R., Handley, L. (2020) ‘Evaluating National Preventive Mechanisms: A Conceptual Model’, Journal of Human Rights Practice, 12(2), pp. 387–408 [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa030 (Accessed: 27 February 2026).

Caughey, C., Liu, H. (2024) ‘Role of national human rights institutions and organizations of persons with disabilities in the national monitoring of the CRPD’ in Rioux, M.H., Viera, J., Buettgen, A., Zubrow, E. (eds.) Handbook of Disability: Critical Thought and Social Change in a Globalizing World. Cham: Springer, pp. 617–641; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6056-7_31.

de Beco, G. (2007) ‘National human rights institutions in Europe’, Human Rights Law Review, 7(2), pp. 331–370 [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngm004 (Accessed: 27 February 2026).

De Schutter, O. (2009) ‘The EU Fundamental Rights Agency: Genesis and Potential, New Institutions for Human Rights Protection’ in Boyle, K. (ed.) New Institutions for Human Rights Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 93–136; https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570546.003.0005.

Doubek, P. (2023) ‘Ombudsman as a National Human Rights Institution: How to Harmonize Different Human Rights Competencies and Meet the Requirement of Pluralism?’, Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi, 31(2), pp. 353–379 [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5817/CPVP2023-2-4 (Accessed: 27 February 2026).

Filip, J., Holländer, P., Šimíček, V. (2007) The Constitutional Court Act. 2nd edn. Prague: C. H. Beck.

Florczak-Wator, M. (2020) Judicial Law-Making in European Constitutional Courts. London: Routledge; https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003022442.

Garlicki, L. (2007) ‘Constitutional courts versus supreme courts’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5(1), pp. 44–68 [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mol044 (Accessed: 27 February 2026).

Grinc, J. (2022) ‘Three Comments on Factors Influencing the Constitutional Court and on the Possibilitcs of their Reflection’, Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi, 30(2), pp. 423–433 [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5817/CPVP2022-2-9 (Accessed: 27 February 2026).

Hossain, K., Besselink, L.F.M., Selassie, H., Selassie, G., Völker, E. (eds.) (2021) Human Rights Commissions and Ombudsman Offices: National Experiences throughout the World. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004481930.

Kokeš, M. (2011) ‘The Application of the Law of the Human Rights Treaties in the Czech Republic (from the point of view of the day-to-day practice of the Czech Constitutional Court) Never ending theoretical conflict, but convergence and harmony in practice?’, ICL Journal, 5(2), pp. 175–187 [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2011-0205 (Accessed: 27 February 2026).

Křepelka, F. (2020) ‘Lip service or genuine consideration of the pan-European general principles of good administration in Czechia?’ in Stelkens, U., Andrijauskaitė, A. (eds.) Good Administration and the Council of Europe: Law, Principles, and Effectiveness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 602–620; https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198861539.003.0024.

Kühn, Z. (2018) ‘The Quality of Justice and of Judicial Reasoning in the Czech Republic’, Ius Gentium, 69, pp. 173–186 [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6_11 (Accessed: 27 February 2026).

Kysela, J., Stádník, J. (2021) ‘Where the Constitutional Court does not go (and not just about that)’, Právník, 160(11), pp. 899–998.

Lacatus, C. (2022) ‘Regulatory networks and regional human rights governance: A study of the European Network of National Human Rights Institutions’, International Relations, 36(2), pp. 192–213 [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178211052880 (Accessed: 27 February 2026).

Lazović, A. (2023) ‘Converging on Structures – The Influence of Court Structure on Convergence and Divergence among Judges’ in Sahadžić, M., Kos, M., Kukavica, J., Wischhoff, J.G., Scholtes, J. (eds.) Accommodating Diversity in Multilevel Constitutional Orders: Legal Mechanisms of Divergence and Convergence. London: Routledge, pp. 193–209; https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003355762-11.

Linhart, J. (2008) Fundamental human rights and freedoms and their procedural protection. Brno: Masaryk University.

Magiera, S., Weiß, W. (2014) ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in the European Union Law’ in Dragos, D.C., Neamțu, B. (eds.) Alternative Dispute Resolution in European Administrative Law. Berlin: Springer Berlin, pp. 489–536; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34946-1_16.

Meuwissen, K. (2015) ‘NHRIs and the state: New and independent actors in the multi-layered human rights system?’, Human Rights Law Review, 15(3), pp. 441–484 [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngv019 (Accessed: 27 February 2026).

Ondřejková, J., Blažková, K., Chmel, J. (2019) ‘The use of foreign legal materials by the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic’ in Ferrari, G.F. (ed.) Judicial Cosmopolitanism: The Use of Foreign Law in Contemporary Constitutional Systems. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, pp. 589–617; https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004297593_024.

Ramcharan, B.G., Magazzeni, G., M'Bikay, M., French, I. (2023) ‘The Paris Principles: Principles Relating to the Status of National Institutions (The Paris Principles) Adopted by General Assembly Resolution 48/134, 20 December 1993’ in Ramcharan, B.G., Magazzeni, G., M'Bikay, M., French, I. (eds.) A Global Handbook on National Human Rights Protection Systems: Published under the Auspices of Geneva for Human Rights. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, pp. 105–108; https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004535053_008.

Sládeček, V., Mikule, V., Suchánek, R., Syllová, J. (2016) Constitution of the Czech Republic. Commentary. 2nd edn. Prague: C. H. Beck.

Sunstein, C.R. (2025) ‘The Separation of Powers is a They, Not An It’, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 48(1), pp. 149–179.

Sześciło, D., Zakroczymski, S. (2021) ‘From Paris to Venice: the international standard of the ombudsman’s independence revisited’, International Journal of Human Rights, 25(10), pp. 1819–1834 [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2021.1895761 (Accessed: 27 February 2026).

Takata, H. (2022) ‘How are the Paris Principles on NHRIs Interpreted? Towards a Clear, Transparent, and Consistent Interpretative Framework’, Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 40(2), pp. 285–305 [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2022.2040863 (Accessed: 27 February 2026).

The Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic (2015a) Competences [Online]. Available at: https://www.usoud.cz/en/competences (Accessed: 27 February 2026).

The Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic (2015b) Guide on Proceedings on Constitutional Complaints [Online]. Available at: https://www.usoud.cz/en/competences (Accessed: 27 February 2026).

The Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic (2015c) Organization [Online]. Available at: https://www.usoud.cz/en/about-the-court/organization (Accessed: 27 February 2026).

The Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic (2025) Yearbook 2024. [Online]. Available at: https://www.usoud.cz/fileadmin/user_upload/ustavni_soud_www/Rocenky/Yearbook_2024_desktop.pdf (Accessed: 27 February 2026).

The Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic (2024) Explanatory Memorandum on the Act no. 77/2025 Coll., amending the Defender Act [Online]. Available at: https://www.psp.cz/sqw/text/tiskt.sqw?O=9&CT=688&CT1=0 (Accessed: 27 February 2026).

Vidović, L., Petričušić, A. (2024) ‘Human Rights and Equality Institutions in Europe: Increasing Efficacy by Finding a Balance between Centralisation and Fragmentation’, Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 24(1), pp. 113–146. https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.24.1.2 (Accessed: 27 February 2026).

Vyhnánek, L. (2024) ‘Constitutional court, facts and scientific knowledge’, Právník, 163(8), pp. 773–790.

Weber, A. (2024) ‘Judicial Protection of Fundamental Rights’ in Babeck, W., Weber, A. (eds.) Writing Constitutions: Volume 2: Fundamental Rights. Berlin: Springer, pp. 605–620; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39622-9_18.

White, M.J.V. (2020) ‘National Human Rights Institutions: From Idea to Implementation’ in Gomez, J., Ramcharan, R. (eds.) National Human Rights Institutions in Southeast Asia – Selected Case Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 21–35; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1074-8_2.

Young, E.A. (2025) ‘States in the Separation of Powers’, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 48(1), pp. 1–31.

Zidouemba, M.T. (2025 ‘Governance and artificial intelligence: the use of artificial intelligence in democracy and its impacts on the rights to participation’, Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5(12) [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00229-5 (Accessed: 27 February 2026).

Downloads

Published

2026-06-13

How to Cite

Škurek, M. (2026). Institutional Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Czech Republic by the Constitutional Court and the National Human Rights Institution. Law, Identity and Values, 6(1), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.55073/2026.1.243-264

Issue

Section

Articles