Legal Regulation of Medically Assisted Reproduction in Croatia:  Is the Grass Green Enough on Our Side?

Aleksandra Korać Graovac

doi:10.55073/2024.2.101-121

Authors

Aleksandra Korać Graovac Full Professor, University in Zagreb, Croatia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2685-8876

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55073/2024.2.101-121

Keywords:

medically assisted reproduction, assisted reproduction technologies, the right of the child to know his origin, reproductive rights, donation of gametes, surrogacy

Abstract

This article addresses the medical and family law aspects of the legal regulation of medically assisted reproduction in Croatia. Croatia has balanced legislation on medically assisted reproduction. The author explains the principles that governed the legislator; namely: the ultima ratio principle, the principle of the protection of participants (prospective parents, donors, and physicians), the principle of the protection of the best interests of the child, and the principle of state control. The Medically Assisted Reproduction Act (2012) and the family law rules in the Family Act are explained. In practice, some problems have emerged. What should be done with surplus cryopreserved embryos? How should donor programs be regulated? How can cross-border surrogacy arrangements be prevented? How should the efficiency of licenced fertility clinics be measured? The author concludes that, despite some objections, Croatia’s legal regulations have successfully balanced the human rights of participants (the child, intended parents, donors, and medical staff).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aitken, R.J. (2022) ‘The changing tide of human fertility’, Human reproduction, 37(4), pp. 629–638; https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac011.

Alinčić, M. (2006) ‘Medicinski pomognuta oplodnja i obiteljskopravni sukobi interesa’, Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, 56(4), pp. 883–910.

Allied Market Research (2019) ‘IVF Services Market Size, Share, Competitive Landscape and Trend Analysis Report by Cycle Type (Fresh IVF Cycles (Non-Donor), Thawed IVF Cycles (Non-donor), and donor Egg (IVF Cycles) and End User (Fertility Clinics, Hospitals, Surgical Centers, and Clinical Research Institutes): Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2019-2026’ Allied Market Research, 2019 [Online]. Available at: https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/IVF-in-vitrofertilization-services-marketn (Accessed: 14 October 2024).

Bulmanska-Wingett, M. (2023) ‘The Imperative of Equal Access to Fertility Treatments across Europe:’, Fertility Europe, June 9 [Online]. Available at: https://fertilityeurope.eu/whitepaper2023summary/ (Accessed: 30 August 2024).

ECHR (2011) ‘Austrian ban on using sperm and ova donation for in vitro fertilisation was not in breach of the Convention’ ECHR, 3 November [Online]. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22003-3731931-4257359%22]} (Accessed: 17 October 2023).

ECHR (2023a) ‘Gestational Surrogacy’ ECHR, September 2023 [Online]. Available at: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/fs_surrogacy_eng (Accessed: 14 October 2024).

ECHR (2023b) ‘Reproductive Rights’ ECHR, December 2023 [Online]. Available at: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/fs_reproductive_eng (Accessed: 14 October 2024).

European Commission (2024) ‘EU Coding Platform’ European Commission, 2024 [Online]. Available at: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/eucoding/reports/te/index.xhtml (Accessed: 25 February 2024).

European Parliamentary Forum for Sexual & Reproductive Rights (2021) ‘European Atlas of Fertility Treatment Policies’ European Parliamentary Forum for Sexual & Reproductive Rights, December [Online]. https://www.epfweb.org/sites/default/files/2022-03/FERTIL%20Atlas_EN%202021-v10.pdf (Accessed: 20 August 2023).

Fortin, J. (2011) ‘Children’s Right to Know Their Origins - Too Far, Too Fast?’, Child & Family Law Quarterly, 21, pp. 336–355.

ICMART (2017) ‘The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care’ ICMART, 2017 [Online]. Available at: https://www.icmartivf.org/glossary/a-d/ (Accessed: 25 October 2023).

Ishii, T., de Miguel Beriain, I. (2022) ‘Shifting to a model of donor conception that entails a communication agreement among the parents, donor, and offspring’, BMC Med Ethics, 23(18), pp. 1–11; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00756-1.

Korać Graovac, A. (1999) ‘Draft of the Croatian Act on Medically Assisted Procreation – Balancing Procreative Rights’, Društvena istraživanja: časopis za opća društvena pitanja, 8(2–3), pp. 229–238.

Korać Graovac, A. (2022) ‘The Content of the Right to Parental Care’ in Sobczyk, P. (ed.) Content of the Right to Parental Responsibility. Experiences – Analyses – Postulates. Miskolc–Budapest: Central European Academic Publishing, pp. 37–72; https://doi.org/10.54237/profnet.2022.pscrpr.

Lebret, A. (2020) ‘The European Court of Human Rights and the framing of Reproductive Rights’, Droits Fondamentaux, 18, pp. 1–63 [Online]. Available at: https://www.crdh.fr/revue/n-18-2020/the-european-court-of-human-rightsand-the-framing-of-reproductive-rights/ (Accessed: 14 October 2024).

Levine, H., Jørgensen, N., Martino-Andrade, A., Mendiiola, J., Weksler-Derri, D., Jolles, M., PInotti, R., Swan, S.H. (2023) ‘Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of samples collected globally in the 20th and 21st centuries’, Human Reproduction Update, 29(2), pp. 157–176; https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmac035.

Lind, J. (2019) ‘The rights of intended children: The best interests of the child argument in assisted reproduction policy’, Childhood, 26(3), pp. 352–368 https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568219853331.

Margaletić, A.C., Preložnjak, B., Šimović, I. (2019) ‘Presumption of motherhood on crossroad of surrogacy arrangements in EU’, EU and comparative law issues and challenges series (ECLIC), 2019/3, pp. 778–802; https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/9031.

Preložnjak, B. (2020) ‘Is it legitimate to limit the procreative Right?’, InterEULawEast: Journal for the international and european law, economics and market integrations, 7(1), pp. 89–99; https://doi.org/10.22598/iele.2020.7.1.5.

Ravitsky, V. (2017) ‘The right to know one’s genetic origins and cross-border medically assisted reproduction’, Israel journal of health policy research, 6(3), pp. 1–6; https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-016-0125-0.

Swann, S.H., Stacey, C. (2021) Countdown: how our modern world is threatening sperm counts, altering male and female reproductive development, and imperiling the future of the human race. New York: Scribner, an imprint of Simon & Schuster, Inc.

Udruga B.a.b.e. zgrožena oslobađajućom presudom Asimu Kurjaku i ocjenama sutkinje (2009) Index, 28 January [Online]. Available at: https://www.index.hr/vijesti/clanak/udruga-babe-zgrozena-oslobadjajucom-presudom-asimu-kurjaku-i-ocjenamasutkinje/419035.aspx (Accessed: 19 October 2023).

United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (2018) ‘RODA – Parents in Action (Croatia) to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in response to UNHCHR WRGS/LOH/Res33/18’ UNHCHR, 1 February [Online]. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Women/WRGS/FollowUp2018/Roda_Croatia.pdf (Accessed: 1 November 2023).

WHO (2024) ‘Infertility’ WHO, 22 May [Online]. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infertility (Accessed: 17 August 2023).

Wood, N. (2005) ‘Bishops in Croatia assail fertility method’, The New York Times, 25 February [Online]. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/25/news/bishopsin-croatia-assail-fertility-method.html (Accessed: 19 October 2023).

Zemunović, R. (2017) ‘Velike price – Moju kćer rodila je surogat mama iz Ukrajine. Nisam jedina u Hrvatskoj, ali sam prva koja govori za medije’, Telegram, 17 October [Online]. Available at: https://www.telegram.hr/price/moju-kcer-rodila-je-surogatmama-iz-ukrajine-nisam-jedina-u-hrvatskoj-ali-sam-prva-koja-govori-za-medije/ (Accessed: 12 October 2023).

Zupančič, K. (2001) ‘Spočetje z biomedicinsko pomočjo in pravo’, Pravna praksa, 20(18), pp. 5–9.