Should Exams Conducted by Public Administration Bodies Be Subject to Judicial Review? Case of the Polish Matriculation Exam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47078/2026.1.157-173Keywords:
state exams, public administration exams, judicial review, matriculation exam, university admissionAbstract
The legal systems of various states establish a range of examinations conducted by public administration authorities, administrative institutions, professional self-governing bodies and other entities in public administration. However, the existence of various examinations within administrative law raises questions regarding the judicial review of such examinations. This problem appeared in Polish law, which was addressed very inconsistently; judicial review was allowed for some exams, while control over others was excluded. The article addresses the issue of judicial review of examinations in Polish administrative law, focusing on the controversial example of the matriculation examination (matura) in the context of the admissibility of challenging examination procedures before the administrative courts.
Downloads
References
Asimow, M. (2015) ‘Five models of administrative adjudication’, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 63(1), pp. 3–31; https://doi.org/10.2307/26386647.
Bąkowski, T., Kornberger-Sokołowska, E. (2017) ‘Opinia z 27.4.2016 r. o projekcie ustawy o zmianie ustawy o systemie oświaty oraz niektórych innych ustaw (RL-0303-11/16)’, Przegląd Legislacyjny, 2017(2), pp. 154–158.
Czepek, J. (2025) ‘The Universal Protection of Human Rights and Central Europe: Poland’, Central European Journal of Comparative Law, 6(1), pp. 49–80; https://doi.org/10.47078/2025.1.49-80.
Dańczak, P. (2015) Decyzja administracyjna w indywidualnych sprawach studentów i doktorantów. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Flisek, K. (2017) ‘Odwołanie od wyniku egzaminu maturalnego’, Roczniki Administracji i Prawa, XVII(2017), pp. 201–207.
Gut, D. (2024) ‘Model of adjudicatory powers of Polish administrative courts’, Contemporary Central and East European Law, 1(135), pp. 1–16; https://doi.org/10.37232/cceel.2024.02.
Hesse-Gawęda, A. (2016) ‘How polish schools use information from external examinations system for development – the results of school evaluation’, INTED2016 Proceedings, pp. 418–423; https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2016.1100.
Jackowski, M. (2017) ‘Judicial Review of Public Power in Poland’ in Arnold, R., Martínez-Estay, J. (eds.) Rule of Law, Human Rights and Judicial Control of Power. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. Vol 61. Cham: Springer, pp. 53–66; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55186-9_3.
Jakubowski, A. (2011) ‘Glosa do postanowienia WSA z dnia 28 lipca 2006 r. (I SA/Wa 2027/05)’, Przegląd Prawa Publicznego, 6(2011), pp. 62–70.
Jakubowski, M. (2015) Opening up opportunities: Education reforms in Poland. IBS Policy Paper, 01(2015). Warszawa: IBS.
Jakubowski, M., Patrinos, H.A., Porta, E.E., Wiśniewski, J. (2016) ‘The effects of delaying tracking in secondary school: evidence from the 1999 education reform in Poland’, Education Economics, 24(6), pp. 557–572; https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2016.1149548.
Jakubowski, M, Patrinos, H.A., Porta P., Emilio, E., Wisniewski, J. (2010) The impact of the 1999 education reform in Poland (English). Policy Research working paper No. WPS 5263. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group [Online]. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/153761468095960833/The-impact-of-the-1999-education-reform-in-Poland (Accessed: 15 November 2025).
Jakubowski, M. (2021) ‘Poland: Polish education reforms and evidence from international assessments’ in Crato, W.N. (ed.) Improving a country’s education: PISA 2018 results in 10 countries. Cham: Springer, pp. 137–158; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59031-4
Kellaghan, T., Greaney, V., (2020) Public Examinations Examined. Washington, DC: World Bank; https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1418-1.
Kellaghan, T., Madaus, G. (2003) ‘External (Public) Examinations’ in Kellaghan, T., Stufflebeam, D.L. (eds.) International Handbook of Educational Evaluation. Kluwer International Handbooks of Education. Vol 9. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 577–600; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_34.
Kierznowski, Ł. (2016) Egzamin maturalny w Polsce. Analiza prawna. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Prawo i Partnerstwo.
Kierznowski, Ł. (2021) Egzaminy zewnętrzne w latach 2015-2018 w świetle zasady zaufania do państwa i prawa. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Kierznowski, Ł. (2025) ‘Establishing a System for Verifying Matriculation Exam in Polish Administrative Law: Selected Aspects’, Institutiones Administrationis - Journal of Administrative Sciences, 5(1), pp. 124–134; https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.156.
Kierznowski, Ł. (2023a) Prawne przyczyny nieprawidłowego oceniania egzaminów maturalnych. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Kierznowski, Ł. (2023b) ‘Status prawny i tryb działania Kolegium Arbitrażu Egzaminacyjnego’, Przegląd Prawa Publicznego, 6(185), pp. 41–52.
Kierznowski, Ł. (2024) ‘The effects of an incorrect assessment of a matriculation exam on college admission procedures in Poland’, Studia Iuridica Toruniensia, 33(2), pp. 151–170; https://doi.org/10.12775/SIT.2023.025.
Króliczek, P. (2016) ‘Glosa do wyroku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z 22 czerwca 2015 r., sygn. SK 29/13’, Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego, 3(31), pp. 397–406; https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2016.03.18.
Kwiek, M. (2013) ‘From System Expansion to System Contraction: Access to Higher Education in Poland’, Comparative Education Review, 3(57), pp. 553–577; https://doi.org/10.1086/670662.
Kwiek, M. (2014) ‘Structural changes in the Polish higher education system (1990–2010): a synthetic view’, European Journal of Higher Education, 4(3), pp. 266–280; https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2014.905965.
Lemańska, J. (2016) ‘The principle of effective legal protection in Polish administrative law’ in Szente, Z., Lachmayer, K. (eds.) The principle of effective legal protection in administrative law: A European perspective. 1st edn. London: Routledge, pp. 123–144; https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315553979.
Najwyższa Izba Kontroli (2015) Informacja o wynikach kontroli. System egzaminów zewnętrznych w oświacie [Information on the results of the inspection carried out by NIK: 'System egzaminów zewnętrznych w oświacie.]. Report No. K-4101-002-00/2014.
Salachna J.M., Ostrowska, A. (2023) ‘The Right to a Trial When Applying for Public Funds for Educational Tasks in the Light of the Evolution of the Case Law of Administrative Courts’, Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica, 22(2), pp. 125–150; https://doi.org/10.15290/mhi.2023.22.02.06.
Skoczylas, A., Swora, M. (2007) ‘Administrative judiciary in Poland in search for fairness and efficiency: An overview’, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 19(E), pp. 116–125.
Spanou, C. (2020) ‘Judicial controls over the bureaucracy’, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, 31 March; https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1729.
Szyszka, А. (2022) ‘The Model of Adjudication by Administrative Courts in Poland’ [Теорія та практика судової експертизи і криміналістики], Theory and Practice of Forensic Expertise and Criminalistics, 4(29), pp. 134–148; https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.4.2022.07.
Tobor, Z., Zeifert, M. (2018) ‘How Polish courts use previous judicial decisions?’, Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 27(1), pp. 191–204; https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2018.27.1.191.
West, R., Crighton, J. (1999) ‘Examination Reform in Central and Eastern Europe: Issues and trends’, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 6(2), pp. 271–289; https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949992919.
Wiącek, M. (2021) ‘Legal Position of Administrative Courts in Poland: Commercial and Financial Cases Perspective’, International Community Law Review, 23(5), pp. 526–539; https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-23050007.
Wrońska, I., Dubowski, T. (2023) ‘Axiology of the Law of the European Legal Space and the Development of the Administrative Court System in Poland’, Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica, 22(2), pp. 221–243; https://doi.org/10.15290/mhi.2023.22.02.10.

