Towards a Unified Civil Law in North Macedonia: The Path of Codification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47078/2025.2.307-332Keywords:
civil law, codification, real property, obligations, successionAbstract
This study analyses the development of civil law in the Macedonian legal system and the activities directed towards civil law codification. The development of civil law is examined through several stages that coincide with significant historical events in Macedonian history. In the first stage (from the 14th to the 20th century), Macedonia was under the rule of the Ottoman Empire and subjected to the laws of the Empire. In the second stage (first half of the 20th century), Macedonia was incorporated into the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, while civil law relations were regulated by the Serbian Civil Code of 1844. The third stage (the second half of the 20th century) is the period of socialism in Macedonia, when civil law regulation was tailored to fit the socialist ideology of working-class governance and a state-operated economy. The fourth stage of development covers the end of the 20th century to the present (the 21st century). Today, North Macedonia is a democratic and independent state oriented towards a free-market economy. Civil law relations are regulated by three basic laws, one for each branch of civil law: real property is regulated by the Ownership and Other Real Rights Act of 2001, obligations are regulated by the Obligations Act of 2001, and succession is regulated by the Succession Act of 1996. In addition, there are subject-specific laws regulating particular civil law areas. At this stage in the development of the civil law system, a process of civil law codification was set in motion by the Ministry of Justice. This study presents the activities undertaken from 2009 to 2025 towards the goal of codifying civil law, their effects, and initiatives for moving forward.
Downloads
References
Albanesi, E. (2017) ’Codification in civil law jurisdiction: an Italian perspective’, European Journal of Law Reform, 19(4), pp. 264–284 [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5553/EJLR/138723702017019004003 (Accessed: 2 September 2025).
Bergel, J.L. (1988) ’Principal Features and Methods of Codification’, Louisiana Law Review, 48, pp. 1073–1097 [Online]. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol48/iss5/3 (Accessed: 2 September 2025).
Elischer, D., Frinta, O., Pauknerová, M. (2013) ‘Recodification of Private Law in the Czech Republic’ in Rivera, J.C. (ed.) The Scope and Structure of Civil Codes. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 105–132; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7942-6_5.
Glenn, H.P. (2004 ) Legal Traditions of the World. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Government of the Republic of North Macedonia (2025) ’Program for the activities of the Government of the Republic of North Macedonia for 2025’, Government of the Republic of North Macedonia [Online]. Available at: https://vlada.mk/sites/default/files/img/programa_vlada_2025.pdf (Accessed: 2 September 2025).
Krešić, M. (2017) ‘A Review of the Development of Private Law in Croatia 1848-1945’, Rechtsgeschichtliche Vortrage, 75, pp. 3–16 [Online]. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321579600_A_Review_of_the_Development_of_Private_Law_in_Croatia_1848-1945 (Accessed: 02 September 2025).
Legrand, P. (1994) ’Strange Power of Words: Codification Situated’, Tulan European & Civil Law Forum, 9(1), pp. 1–34.
Merryman, J.H. (1985) The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western Europe and Latin America. 2nd ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mirković, Z. (2020) ‘Kodifikovanje građanskog zakonika nove države i njegovo mesto u istoriji međuratnih evropskih kodifikacija’ in Begović, B., Mirković, Z. (eds.) Sto godina od ujedinjenja – formiranje države i prava. Belgrade: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, pp. 270–280.
Mousourakis, G. (2012) Fundamentals of Roman Private Law. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29311-5.
Murillo, M. (2001) ’The Evolution of Codification in the Civil Law Legal Systems: Towards Decodification and Recodification’, Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, 11(1), pp. 163–182 [Online]. Available at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/jtlp/vol11/iss1/5 (Accessed: 2 September 2025).
O’Connor, V. (2012) Practitioner’s guide: Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. INPROL - International Network to Promote the Rule of Law. International Network to Promote the Rule of Law [Online]. Available at: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/2015/Common%20and%20Civil%20Law%20Traditions.pdf (Accessed: 2 September 2025).
Popelier, P. (2017) ’Codification in civil law jurisdiction: northern european perspective’, European Journal of Law Reform, 19(4), pp. 253–263 [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5553/EJLR/138723702017019004002 (Accessed: 2 September 2025).
Popović, D. (2024) ’Serbian Civil Code in the History of Serbian Law’, Pravni zapisi, 15(2), pp. 466–479 [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap15-53494 (Accessed: 2 September 2025).
Radwański, Z. (2006) Green Paper: An Optimal Vision of the Civil Code of the Republic of Poland. Warsaw: Ministry of Justice [Online]. Available at: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/11410374/an-optimal-vision-of-the-civil-electronic-journal-of-comparative-law (Accessed: 2 September 2025).
Rivera J.C. (2013) ‘The Scope and Structure of Civil Codes. Relations with Commercial Law, Family Law, Consumer Law and Private International Law. A Comparative Approach’ in Rivera, J.C. (ed) The Scope and Structure of Civil Codes. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 3–39; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7942-6_1.
Rothman, N.C. (2007) ’Islam in Turkey and Modernisation: The Tanzimat Period’, Comparative Civilisations Review, 56(56), pp. 76–92 [Online]. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol56/iss56/7 (Accessed: 2 September 2025).
Serbian Civil Code of 1944 [Online]. Available at: https://www.harmonius.org/sr/pravni-izvori/jugoistocna-evropa/privatno-pravo/srbija/Srpski_gradjanski_zakonik_1844.pdf (Accessed: 2 September 2025).
Stanković, E. (2014) ’Fundamina’, Pretoria, 20(2), pp. 881–890.
Strategy for reform of the judicial sector 2017-2022 [Online]. Available at: https://www.pravda.gov.mk/Upload/Documents/2017-2022.pdf (Accessed: 2 September 2025).
Treaty between Great Britain, Germany, Austria, France, Italy, Russia, and Turkey for the Settlement of Affairs in the East: Signed at Berlin, July 13, 1878, The American Journal of International Law, 2(4), pp. 401–424 [Online]. Available at: https://eclass.uoa.gr/modules/document/file.php/ARCH258/Berlin%20Treaty%20of%201878.pdf (Accessed: 2 September 2025).
Vasilev, Lj. (1963) ’Basic questions of civil law codification in the People's Republic of Bulgaria’, Strani Pravni Zivot, 1963/3, pp. 3–17.
Veress, E. (2023) ‘Private Law Codifications in East Central Europe’ in Sáry, P. (ed.) Lectures on East Central European Legal History. 2nd edn. Miskolc-Budapest: Central European Academic Publishing, pp. 193–233; https://doi.org/10.54171/2023.ps.loecelh_8.
Vlačić, M. (2020) ‘The Codification of the Commercial Law in the Interwar Yugoslavia’ in Gosztonyi, G., Krešić, M., Beliznai Bódi, K. (eds.) Collection of papers on Hungarian and Croatian legal history. Zagreb: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law, Chair of Croatian History of Law and State, pp. 98–105 [Online]. Available at: https://edit.elte.hu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10831/108381/Sic_itur_IV_Vlacic_p_98-105.pdf?sequence=1 (Accessed: 2 September 2025).
Voermans, W., Moll, C., Florijn, N., Van Lochem, P. (2008) ’Codification and Consolidation in the European Union: A Means to Untie Red Tape’, Statute Law Review, 29(2), pp. 65–81 [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmn007 (Accessed: 2 September 2025).
Wagner Wencelas, J. (1953) ’Codification of Law in Europe and the Codification Movement in the Middle of the Nineteenth Century in the United States’, Saint Louis University Law Journal, pp. 335–359 [Online]. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/2324 (Accessed: 2 September 2025).
Weiss, G.A. (2000) ‘The Enchantment of Codification in the Common-Law World’, Yale Journal of International Law, 25, pp. 435–532.
Zhivkovska, R., Przheska, T. (2014) ’Codification of the civil law in the Republic of Macedonia’, Collection of Papers of the Law Faculty in Nish, 68, pp. 251–267 [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfni1468251Z (Accessed: 2 September 2025).
Zimmermann, R. (2003) ‘The Civil Law in European Codes’ in MacQueen, H.L., Vaquer, A., Espiau, S.E. (eds.) Regional Private Laws, and Codification in Europe. Cambridge: University Press, pp. 18–59; https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495007.002.
Zimmermann, R. (2012) ‘Codification. The Civilian Experience Reconsidered on the Eve of a Common European Sales Law’, Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law, 8(4), pp. 367–399 [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/ercl-2012-1000 (Accessed: 2 September 2025).
Групче, А. [Grupche, A.] (1983) Имотно (Граѓанско) право, втор дел, Стварно прво [Property (Civil) Law, part two, Property Law]. Скопје: Култура [Skopje: Kultura].
Живковска, Р. [Zhivkovska, R.] (2005) Стварно право [Property Law]. Скопје: Европа 92 [Skopje: Evropa 92].
Матовски, Н. [Matovski, N.] (1990) Кануни и фермани за Македонија [Quanuns and Fermans for Macedonia]. Скопје: Мисла [Skopje: Misla].
Стојановић, Д., Георгиев, Д.П., Максимовски, Р. [Stojanović, D., Georgiev, D.P., Maksimovski, R.] (1982) Коментар на ЗОСПО [Commentary on the Basic Property Relations Act – BPRA]. Београд: Сл. лист на СФР Југославија [Beograd: Official Gazette of the SFR of Yugoslavia].
Шуканова, А., Панов, М., Ѓоргиев, Д., Битковски, К., Катарџиев, И., Стојчев, В., Велјановски, Н., & Чепреганов, Т. [Shukanova, A., Panov, M., Ghorgiev, D., Bitkovski, K., Catardziev, I., Stojchev, V., Veljanovski, N., Chepreganov, T.] (2008) Историја на македонскиот народ [History of the Macedonian People]. Скопје: Институт за национална историја [Skopje: Institute of National History].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
