European Integration and Political Evolution of the Modern Nation-State

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47078/2024.2.261-279

Keywords:

European integration, federalization of EU, transfer of sovereignty, centralization of power, European constitutional history

Abstract

This paper draw attention to the fact that the current processes of the convergence of national legal systems within the EU have their source beyond contemporary political integration of the Old Continent. Contemporary European integration is merely one stage of the processes that are launched over a longer period and develop in a way that is not accidental. The cultural choices that triggered integration processes make the process hardly manageable in political terms but rather predetermine political choices. Therefore, institutions having some primary constitutional functions appear to provide a concurrently important contribution to parallel and more important socio-political processes. First, it concerns judicial bodies providing a review of the actions taken by public authorities. The performance of those duties reveals its important function in the political subordination of national authorities to the authorities providing legal patterns for such a judicial review. In this way, administrative courts played an important role in the emergence of parliamentary states in the 20th century, whereas constitutional courts played a key role in the process of transposing sovereign competencies from nation-states to institutions operating at the supranational level. This process of the vertical transposition of sovereign powers beyond nationstates continues even when constitutional courts declare their determination to protect the sovereign position of their national constitutions, as the process is already too advanced to be stopped. Parallel political process leads to attributing the European Parliament with sovereign legislative powers, simultaneously reducing the importance of the legitimacy attributed to the EU by national governments. In this way, a postmodern supranational state is emerging. Even if this process assumes some transitional periods suggesting its lowering down or some alternative paths of the integration, the only possible endpoint seems to be a unified supranational European parliamentary state. Moreover, it seems hardly possible to prevent this process otherwise than through a radical change in intellectual culture that predetermines contingent political actions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bakircioglu, O. (2007) ‘The Application of the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in Freedom of Expression and Public Morality Cases’, German Law Journal, 8(7), pp. 711–733; https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200005885.

Beck, U., Grande, E. (2009) Europa kosmopolityczna. Społeczeństwo i polityka w drugiej nowoczesności, Warszawa: WN Scholar.

Eissen M-A., (1990) ‘Interaction de jurisprudences constitutionnelles nationales et de la jurisprudence et la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme’ in Rousseau, D., Sudre, F. (eds.) Conseil constitutionnel et Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme Paris: STH.

Garlicki L. (1998) Polskie prawo konstytucyjne. Zarys wykładu, Warszawa: Liber.

Graser, A. (2023) ‘The Dilemma of the Presumptuous Watchdog: Constitutional Identity in the Jurisprudence of the German Federal Constitutional Court’, in Varga, Zs., A., Berkes, L. (eds.) Common Values and Constitutional Identities. Can Separate Gears Be Synchronised?, Budapest – Miskolc: Central European Academic Publishing, pp. 13–49; https://doi.org/10.54237/profnet.2023.avlbcvci_1.

Heine E. (1995) Sexual Orientation: A Human Right: An Essay on International Human Rights Law, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff; https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004637757.

Hurrell, A. (2007) On Globar Order: Power Values and the Constitution of International Society, Oxford: OUP, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199233106.001.0001.

Klabbers, J., Peters, A., Ulfstein, G. (2009) The Constitutionalization of International Law, Oxford: OUP, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543427.001.0001.

Kowalik-Bańczyk, K. (2005) ‘Should We Polish It Up? The Polish Constitutional Tribunal and the Idea of Supremacy of EU Law’, German Law Review, 6(10), pp. 1355–1366; https://doi.org/10.1017/S207183220001436X.

Kumm, M. (2005) ‘The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe before and after the Constitutional Treaty’, European Law Journal, 11(3), pp. 262–307; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00260.x.

Lash, S. (1994) ‘Reflexivity and its Doubles’ in Beck, U., Giddens, A., Lash, S., Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Łętowska, E. (2005a) ‘„Multicentryczność” systemu prawa i wykładnia jej przyjazna’ in W. Popiołek, W., Ogiegła, L., Szpunar, M. (eds.) Rozprawy prawnicze księga pamiątkowa profesora Maksymiliana Pazdana, Kraków (Zakamycze), pp. 1127–1146.

Łętowska, E. (2005b) ‘Multicentryczność współczesnego systemu prawa i jej konsekwencje’, Państwo i Prawo, 4, pp. 3–10.

Locke, J. (1824) Two Treatises of Government, A New Edition, London.

Lyotard, J.-F., Thébaud, J.-L. (1985) ‘Just Gaming’, tłum. W. Godzich 8ed.), Theory and History of Literature, Manchester University Press, 20. [Online] Available at: https://books.google.com.bz/books?id=SBjoAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_book_other_versions_r&hl=pl&pli=1#v=onepage&q&f=false (Accessed: 2 December 2024).

Martens S.K. (2000) ‘De grenzen van de rechtsvormende taak van de rechter’, Nederlands Juristenblad, 75, p. 750.

Montesquieu, Ch. (1859) OEvre completes de Montesquieu Vol. 1. Paris.

Morawski, L. (2001) Co może dać nauce prawa postmodernizm?, Toruń: TNOiK.

Sadurski, W. (2006) ‘Solange, Chapter 3: Constitutional Courts in Central Europe - Democracy - European Union’, EUI LAW Working Paper No. 2006/40, December 2006. [Online] Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.963757 (Accessed: 2 December 2024).

Sadurski, W. (2009) Trzecia debata Tocqueville’owska. Sąd czy ustawodawca: Legitymizacja sądownictwa konstytucyjnego we współczesnej Europie, Łódź: Centrum Myśli Polityczno-prawnej, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.963757.

Stępkowski, A. (2023) ‘Polish Constitutional Identity and the EU Challenges: European Law as a Tool for the Redrafting of the Polish Constitution’ in Varga, Zs. A., Berkes, L. (eds.) Common Values and Constitutional Identities. Can Separate Gears Be Synchronised? Budapest – Miskolc: Central European Academic Publishing, pp. 225–270; https://doi.org/10.54237/profnet.2023.avlbcvci_7.

Stępkowski, A. (2010) Zasada Proporcjonalności w europejskiej kulturze prawnej. Sądowa kontrola władzy dyskrecjonalnej w Nowoczesnej Europie, Warszawa: Liber.

Sulikowski, A. (2002) ‘Francuska koncepcja suwerenności i jej ewolucja w procesie integracji europejskiej’, Państwo i Prawo, 8, pp. 76–88.

Tkaczyński, J.W. (2005), ‘Egzekutywa demokratycznego państwa prawa wobec współczesnych wyzwań cywilizacyjnych’, Politeja, 2(4), pp. 300–316.

Wojtyczek, K. (2009) ‘Trybunał Konstytucyjny w europejskim systemie konstytucyjnym’, Przegląd Sejmowy, 4(93), pp. 177–191.

de Werd, M.F.J.M. (2004) ‘De constitutionele taak van de rechter Grenzen aan de rechtspraak? Political question, acte de gouvernement en rechterlijk interventionisme’ in Bovend’Eert, P.P.T., van den Eijnden, P.M., Kortmann C.A.J.M (eds.) Staatsrechtconferentie 2004, Kluwer.

Żyro, T. (2008) Wola polityczna. Siedem prób z filozofii praktycznej, Warszawa: Wyd. Akademickie i Profesjonalne.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-28

How to Cite

Stępkowski, A. (2024). European Integration and Political Evolution of the Modern Nation-State. Central European Journal of Comparative Law, 5(2), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.47078/2024.2.261-279

Issue

Section

Articles