Some Remarks on the Recent SRM Related Case-Law of the CJEU with Special Regard to the Meroni Doctrine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47078/2024.2.185-209

Keywords:

Meroni, delegation of power, Banking Union, Single Supervisory Mechanism, Single Resolution Mechanism, Banco Popular Group

Abstract

The study elaborates on the development of the Meroni doctrine, derived from the Meroni judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Coal and Steel Community under a different Founding Treaty framework and its applicability to the Banking Union under the current Treaty framework. To fulfil this aim, the author first elaborates on the Advocate General’s opinion and the Judgment of the Court of Justice in the Meroni case and then briefly introduces the evolution and the literature on the issue. After a short introduction of the Banking Union’s institutional order, the author introduces two cases in which issues related to the Meroni doctrine were raised before the General Court, as well as the appellate procedures before the Court of Justice in one of these cases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Babis, V. (2018) ‘The Single Rulebook and the European Banking Authority’ in Fabbrini, F., Ventoruzzo, M. (eds.) Research Handbook on EU Economic Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 262–286; https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788972345.00018.

Chamon, M. (2010) ‘EU Agencies: Does the Meroni Doctrine Make Sense?’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 17(3), 281– 305; https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X1001700304.

Chamon, M., (2014) ‘The Empowerment of Agencies under the Meroni Doctrine and Article 114 TFEU: Comment on United Kingdom v Parliament and Council (Short-selling) and the Proposed Single Resolution Mechanism’, European Law Review, 39(3), pp. 380–403.

Chamon, M., De Arriba-sellier, N. (2022) ‘FBF: On the Justiciability of Soft Law and Broadening the Discretion of EU Agencies’, European Constitutional Law Review, 8(2) pp. 286–314; https://doi.org/10.1017/S157401962200013X.

Chiarella, L. (2016) ‘The Single Supervisory Mechanism: the Building Pillar of the European Banking Union’, University of Bologna Law Review, 1(1), pp. 34–90.

Ferran, E. (2012) ‘Crisis–driven EU financial regulatory reform: where in the world is the EU going?’ in Ferran, E., Moloney, N., Hill, J. G., Coffee, J. C. (eds.) The regulatory aftermath of the global financial crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–110; https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175821.

Griller, S., Orator, A. (2010) ‘Everything under control? The “way forward” for European agencies in the footsteps of the Meroni doctrine’, European Law Review, 35(1), pp. 3–35.

Kálmán, J. (2013) ‘Az európai ügynökségek és a Meroni-doktrína’, De iurisprudentia et iure publico, 8(3), pp. 1–17.

Marinkás, Gy. (2018) ‘How not to build a Monetary Union? The structural weaknesses of the EMU in the light of the 2008 crisis and the institutional reforms for their correction’, Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, 1, pp. 437–471; https://doi.org/10.5553/HYIEL/266627012018006001025.

Marinkás, Gy. (2020) ‘What if a new crisis comes? – In other words, is the EMU prepared for another possible financial crisis?’ in Blažo, O., Mokrá, L., Máčaj, A. (eds.) Zborník z vedeckej konferencie organizovanej Univerzitou Komenského v Bratislave, Právnickou fakultou dňa 6 a 7. februára 2020 v priestoroch Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave Bratislava. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Právnická Fakulta, pp. 54–67.

Marinkás, Gy. (2024) ‘The ‘almost Completed House’: An Introduction to The Economic and Monetary Union’ in Nagy, Z. (ed) Economic Governance – the Impact of the European Union on the Regulation of Fiscal and Monetary Policy in the Central European Countries. Miskolc-Budapest: Central European Academic Publishing, pp. 641–688; https://doi.org/10.54237/profnet.2024.znecogov_28.

Nagy, Z., Csiszár, A. (2016) ‘A hazai pénzügyi felügyeleti szabályozás a változások tükrében’, Publicationes Universitatis Miskolciensis, Sectio Juridica et Politica, 34(1), pp. 157–163.

Pelkmans, J., Simoncini, M. (2014) ‘Mellowing Meroni: How ESMA can help build the single market, CEPS Commentaries. [Online]. Available at: http://www.ceps.eu/book/mellowingmeroni-how-esma-can-help-build-single-market (Accessed: 14 July 2024).

Repasi, R. (2014) ‘Assessment of the Judgment of the European Court of Justice in Case C-270/12, United Kingdom v Council and European Parliament’ Published by: Sven Giegold (MEP), 2014, pp. 2–3. [Online]. Available at: http://www.svengiegold.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Assessment-ECJ-Case-C-270-12-andrelevance-for-the-SRM1.pdf (Accessed: 1 December 2017).

Simoncini, M. (2021) ‘The Delegation of Powers to EU Agencies After the Financial Crisis’, European Papers, 6(3), pp. 1485–1503.

Szegedi, L. (2012) ‘Challenges of Direct European Supervision of Financial Markets’, Public Finance Quarterly, 53(3), pp. 347–357.

Szegedi, L. (2020) ‘Jogharmonizáció a pénzpiaci területen: szabadulhat-e az Európai Bankhatóság a hatáskör-átruházás korlátainak szorításából?’, Állam- És Jogtudomány, 61 (2), pp. 114–131.

Szegedi, L., Teleki, B. (2024) ‘10 Years of the European Banking Union, 20 Years of Hungarian EU Membership – Not Yet Single Application of the Single Rulebook of the Banking Union in Resolution Decisions’ in: Szabó, M., Gyeney, L., Láncos, P.L. (eds.) Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, 12., Nomos, pp. 117–138. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748946526-117.

Teleki, B. (2023) ‘Az „ügynökségesedés” tendenciája az Európai Unióban és annak hatásai az uniós és a magyar közigazgatásra’. Doktori (PhD) értekezés (Műhelyvitára alkalmas változat), p. 234.

Teleki, B. (2019) ‘Az európai uniós pénzügyi felügyeleti ügynökségek és az uniós közigazgatási eljárásjog kérdése’, Pro Futuro, 9(2), pp. 26–42; https://doi.org/10.26521/Profuturo/2019/2/5437.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-28

How to Cite

Marinkás, G. (2024). Some Remarks on the Recent SRM Related Case-Law of the CJEU with Special Regard to the Meroni Doctrine. Central European Journal of Comparative Law, 5(2), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.47078/2024.2.185-209

Issue

Section

Articles