Consumer Rights in the Event of Lack of Conformity of the Goods in Czech, Slovak, and Polish Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47078/2024.2.101-121Keywords:
conformity, Czech Civil Code, Slovak Civil Code, Polish Civil Code, Polish Consumer Rights Act, repair, replacement, price reduction, termination of the contractAbstract
This work analyses and compares the remedies available to consumers in case of lack of conformity of the goods with the contracts in Czech, Slovak, and Polish law. The Czech Republic and Poland have already transposed Directive (EU) 2019/771 in 2022, but due consideration is also given to the previous regulation based on Directive 1999/44/EC, because rules in the Slovak Civil Code are still based on Directive 1999/44/EC. The authors’ primary objective is to determine similarities, particularities, and divergences between the examined national laws. Each examined legal order entitles the consumer to the remedies of repair, replacement, price reduction, or termination of the contract. Although the interrelation between the remedies and requirements for their application considerably diverged when all the examined legal orders were influenced by Directive 1999/44/EC due to its minimum harmonisation approach, their hierarchy – comprising repair and replacement as the primary remedy with price reduction and termination of the contract as the secondary set of claims – is noticeable. However, the nature of price reduction, as the secondary remedy, is disputed in Czech law. An important exception exists in Slovak law where price reduction substitutes replacement as the primary remedy when the goods are sold for a lower price or when the lack of conformity affecting the second-hand goods is attributable to the seller’s fault. The transposition of Directive (EU) 2019/771 in Czech and Polish law has made the relation between the remedies uniform in these legal orders. It dispelled any doubts regarding their hierarchy in Czech law. Thus, repair and replacement are considered primary while price reduction and termination of the contract are secondary remedies in both the Polish and Czech national laws.
Downloads
References
Afferni G. (2022) La responsabilità del venditore per i difetti materiali del bene, Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
Carvalho, J. M. (2020) ‘Introducción a las Nuevas Directivas sobre Contratos de Compraventa de Bienes y Contenidos o Servicios Digitales’ in Amayuelas, E. A., Lapuente, S. C. (eds.) El derecho privado en el nuevo paradigma digital, Madrid: Colegio Notarial de Cataluña, pp. 31–48.
Carvalho, J. M. (2019) ‘Venda de Bens de Consumo e Fornecimento de Conteúdos e Serviços Digitais – As Diretivas 2019/771 e 2019/770 e o seu Impacto no Direito Português’, Revista Electrónica de Direito, 3(20), pp. 63–87; https://doi.org/10.24840/2182-9845_2019-0003_0004.
Chvátalová, D. (2015) Kupní smlouva v soukromém právu, PhD thesis. Prague: Faculty of Law, Charles University.
Dębski, B. (2016) ‘Powrót sprzedaży konsumenckiej do Kodeksu cywilnego – praktyczne implikacje i teoretyczne problemy’, Palestra, 5, pp. 76–81.
Dudás, A., Hulmák, M., Zimnioková, M., Menyhárd, A, Stec, P., Veress, E., Hlušák, M. (2022) ‘Illegal and Immoral Contracts. Usury. Good Faith in Contract Law’ in Veress, E. (ed.) Contract Law in East Central Europe, Miskolc-Budapest: Central European Academic Publishing, pp. 175–218; https://doi.org/10.54171/2022.ev.cliece_chapter6.
Hajnal, Zs. (2022) ‘The Emergence of Member States’ Characteristics in European and National Consumer Law’ in Osztovits, A., Bóka, J. (eds.) The Policies of the European Union from a Central European Perspective. Miskolc–Budapest: Central European Academic Publishing, pp. 173–195; https://doi.org/10.54171/2022.aojb.poeucep_9.
Hejbudzski, M. (2018) ‘The Importance of the Directive 2011/83/EU for the Transposition of the Directive 1999/44/EC into the Polish Law in the Field of the Seller‘s Liability for Physical Defects of Goods’, International and Comparative Law Review, 18(1), pp. 217–230; https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2018-0033.
Hrádek, J. (2020) ‘Regulation and Jurisdiction Regarding Issues of Consumer Sales Law in Czechia’ in Hajnal, Zs. (ed.) Comparative Analysis of National Jurisdictions and Regulations Regarding Consumer Sales and Unfair Commercial Practices - Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia. Budapest: Editura C.H. Beck, pp. 9–23.
Jagielska, M. (2020) ‘Regulation and Jurisdiction Regarding Issues of Consumer Sales Law in Poland’ in Hajnal, Zs. (ed.) Comparative Analysis of National Jurisdictions and Regulations Regarding Consumer Sales and Unfair Commercial Practices - Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia. Budapest: Editura C.H. Beck, pp. 42–52.
Jansen, S. (2014) ‘Price Reduction as a Consumer Sales Remedy and the Powers of National Courts: Duarte Hueros (case note)’, Common Market Law Review, 51(3), pp. 975–991; https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2014068.
Loos, M. (2016) ‘European Harmonisation of Online and Distance Selling of Goods and the Supply of Digital Content’, Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2016-27, Centre for the Study of European Contract Law Working Paper Series, 8; https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2789398.
Mészáros, P. (2020) ‘Regulation and Jurisdiction Regarding Unfair Commercial Practices in Slovakia’ in Hajnal, Zs. (ed.) Comparative Analysis of National Jurisdictions and Regulations Regarding Consumer Sales and Unfair Commercial Practices - Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Budapest: Editura C.H. Beck, pp. 75–84.
Michel, A. (2016) ‘La directive 1999/44/CE sur la garantie des biens de consommation: un remède efficace contre l’obsolescence programmée?’, Revue Européenne de Droit de la Consommation, 2, pp. 207–236.
Mišćenić, E., Kunda, I., Petrić, S., Butorac Malnar, V., Vrbljanac, D., Winkler, S. (2021) Europsko privatno pravo–posebni dio, Školska knjiga – Zagreb.
Reich, N., Miklitz, H. W., Rott, P., Tonner, K. (2014) European Consumer Law, 2nd edition, Cambridge: Intersentia.
Rodrigo, G. M. (2022) ‘Algunas cuestiones sobre la transposición de la Directiva 2019/771, 20 mayo 2019, relativa a determinados aspectos de los contratos de compaventa de biene’, Actualidad Juridica Iberoamericana, 16, pp. 1288–1313.
Romanò, S. (2020) ‘La riduzione del prezzo e la risoluzione del contratto nella Direttiva 2019/771/UE’, in dalla Massara, T. (ed.) La vendita di beni mobili, Pisa: Pacini Editore, pp. 355–359.
Schwencer, I. (2014) ‘Regional and Global Unification of Contract Law’ in Keyes, M., Wilson, T. (eds.) Codifying Contract Law – International and Consumer Law Perspectives, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 39–55; https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315572505-3.
Švestka, J., Dvořák, J., Fiala, J. et al. (2014), Občanský zákoník, komentář, Sv.V., Wolters Kluwer – Prague.
Tichý, L. (2014) ‘Kupní smlouva a spotřebitelská kupní smlouva, včetně odpovědnosti za vady”, Bulletin Advokacie, 18 August 2014, [Online]. Available at: http://www.bulletin-advokacie.cz/kupni-smlouva-a-spotrebitelska-kupnismlouva-vcetne-odpovednosti-za-vady (Accessed: 1 October 2023).
Twigg-Flesner, C. (2008) The Europeanisation of Contract Law. London–New York: Routledge-Cavendish, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927007.
Veress, E. (2022) ‘Development of Contract Law in East Central Europe’ in Veress, E. (ed.) Contract Law in East Central Europe, Central European Academic Publishing, Miskolc-Budapest, pp. 13-34. https://doi.org/10.54171/2022.ev.cliece_chapter1.
Veress, E., Hulmák, M., Zimnioková, M., Stępkowski, Ł., Dudás, A., Hlušák, M. (2022) ‘Unilateral Termination of Contracts and Rights of Withdrawal’ in Veress, E. (ed.) Contract Law in East Central Europe, Miskolc-Budapest: Central European Academic Publishing, pp. 461-503; https://doi.org/10.54171/2022.ev.cliece_chapter14.
Weatherill, S. (2013) EU Consumer Law and Policy, 2nd edition, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857936981.