Life Sentences, Penal Populism, and Security Confinement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47078/2024.2.71-99Keywords:
penology, life sentence, penal populism, security confinement, Sicherungsverwahrung, death penalty, jus cogensAbstract
This paper critically reflects on the normative and practical meaning and purpose of life sentences and long-term prison sentences, which essentially resembles life sentences in their effect. The analysis provides in-depth knowledge about current trends in the global abolitionist movement, showcasing the current opinio iuris on the jus cogens status of the safeguards against the death penalty. Fully subscribing to said opinio iuris, the authors discuss its likely implications in terms of a future rise in life sentences, focusing on their meaning and relation to long-term prison sentences. This is not only a matter of normative definition but also an important issue in comparative penology that empirically investigates the imposition of life sentences. To test their assumptions about the dubious labelling of essential life sentences as ordinary (long-term) prison sentences, a normative analysis of the current legal framework in nine European states (Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Germany, France, and Switzerland) is presented in this paper. Preliminary findings show that what is labelled ‘life sentence’ in one jurisdiction tends to be a far less severe punishment than the sanction’s name might imply when compared to ‘ordinary (long-term) prison sentence’ in another jurisdiction. However, the matter is far more complex, as numerous states apply the so-called ‘security confinement’ as a security measure. Nevertheless, the authors find that in their effects, such security measures, although not labelled as sanctions, come dangerously close to actual sanctions such as life and long-term prison sentences, thereby normatively undermining current European human rights standards. Since there appears to be a rise in such ‘false labelling’, the phenomenon is considered in the context of penal populism and, in conclusion, discussed as a matter of the very foundations that criminal law builds upon in an attempt to suggest normative and practical solutions.
Downloads
References
Aebi, M.F., Cocco, E., Molnar, L. (2023) SPACE I – Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Prison populations. Survey 2022. Strasbourg: Council of Europe [Online]. Available at: https://wp.unil.ch/space/files/2023/06/230626_SPACE-I_2022_Final-Report.pdf (Accessed: 11 August 2023).
Aebi, M.F., Cocco, E., Molnar, L., Tiago, M. M. (2022) SPACE I – Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Prison populations. Survey 2021. Strasbourg: Council of Europe [Online]. Available at: https://wp.unil.ch/space/files/2023/05/SPACEI_2021_FinalReport.pdf (Accessed: 11 August 2023).
Aebi, M.F., Delgrande, N. (2015) SPACE I – Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Prison populations. Survey 2013. Strasbourg: Council of Europe [Online]. Available at: https://wp.unil.ch/space/files/2015/02/SPACE-I-2013-English.pdf (Accessed: 11 August 2023).
Aebi, M.F., Tiago, M. M. (2018) SPACE I – Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Prison populations. Survey 2018. Strasbourg: Council of Europe [Online]. Available at: https://wp.unil.ch/space/files/2019/06/FinalReportSPACEI2018_190611-1.pdf (Accessed: 11 August 2023).
Aebi, M.F., Tiago, M. M. (2020) SPACE I – Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Prison populations. Survey 2019. Strasbourg: Council of Europe [Online]. Available at: https://wp.unil.ch/space/files/2023/05/200405_FinalReport_SPACE_I_2019.pdf (Accessed: 11 August 2023).
Aebi, M.F., Tiago, M. M. (2021) SPACE I – Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Prison populations. Survey 2020. Strasbourg: Council of Europe [Online]. Available at: https://wp.unil.ch/space/files/2021/04/210330_FinalReport_SPACE_I_2020.pdf (Accessed: 11 August 2023).
Aebi, M.F., Tiago, M. M., Burkhardt, C. (2015) SPACE I – Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Prison populations. Survey 2014. Strasbourg: Council of Europe [Online]. Available at: https://wp.unil.ch/space/files/2019/02/SPACE-I-2014-Report_Updated_190129.2-1.pdf (Accessed: 11 August 2023).
Aebi, M.F., Tiago, M. M., Burkhardt, C. (2016) SPACE I – Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Prison populations. Survey 2015. Strasbourg: Council of Europe [Online]. Available at: https://wp.unil.ch/space/files/2017/04/SPACE_I_2015_FinalReport_161215_REV170425.pdf (Accessed: 11 August 2023).
Aebi, M.F., Tiago, M.M., Berger-Kolopp, L., Burkhardt, C. (2017) SPACE I – Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Prison populations. Survey 2016. Strasbourg: Council of Europe [Online]. Available at: https://wp.unil.ch/space/files/2019/02/SPACE-I-2016-Final-Report_Updated_190207.1.pdf (Accessed: 11 August 2023).
Ashworth, A., Zedner, L. (2010) ‘Preventive Orders: A Problem of Undercriminalization?’ in Duff, R.A., Farmer, L., Marshall, S.E., Renzo, M., Tadros, V. (eds.) The Boundaries of the Criminal Law, Criminalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press; https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199600557.003.0003.
Beccaria, C. (1995) ‘The death penalty’ in Bellamy, R. (ed.), Davies, R. (tran.) Beccaria: ‘On Crimes and Punishments’ and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought), pp. 66–72; https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802485.037.
Bernaz, N. (2013) Life Imprisonment and the Prohibition of Inhuman Punishments in International Human Rights Law: Moving the Agenda Forward, Human Rights Quarterly, 35(2), pp. 470–497. [Online]. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24518024 (Accessed: 11 August 2023).
Bessler, J. (2018) ‘The Abolitionist Movement Comes of Age: From Capital Punishment as a Lawful Sanction to a Peremptory, International Law Norm Barring Executions’, Montana Law Review, 79(1), pp. 7–79.
Bessler, J. (2022) The Death Penalty’s Denial of Fundamental Human Rights: International Law, State Practice, and the Emerging Abolitionist Norm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108980159.
Bessler, J. (2023) A Torturous Practice: Prohibiting the Death Penalty’s Use Through a Peremptory Norm of International Law. Faculty of Law Blogs / University of Oxford [Online]. Available at: https://blogs.law.ox.ac.uk/death-penalty-research-unitblog/blog-post/2023/05/torturous-practice-prohibiting-death-penaltys (Accessed: 23 June 2023).
Boos, S. (2022) Begleiteter Suizid im Gefängnis: Was wäre ein normales Leben für Verwahrte? [Online]. Available at: https://www.woz.ch/2213/begleiteter-suizidim-gefaengnis/was-waere-ein-normales-leben-fuer-verwahrte (Accessed: 16 June 2023).
Boos, S. (2023) Was weiter geschah: Erster Verwahrter mit Exit gestorben [Online]. Available at: https://www.woz.ch/2310/was-weiter-geschah/erster-verwahrtermit-exit-gestorben/!SX1NEM71DCMQ (Accessed: 16 June 2023).
Borbón, D. (2022) Neurosociology and Penal Neuroabolitionism: Rethinking Justice With Neuroscience, Frontiers in Sociology, 7, pp. 1–5; https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.814338.
Campbell, A., Converse, P., Rodgers W. (1976) The Quality of American Life. Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation [Online]. Available at: https://www.russellsage.org/sites/default/files/QualityAmLife.pdf (Accessed: 11 August 2023).
Council of Europe (2016). 25th General Report [Online] Available at: https://rm.coe.int/1680696a9d%20accessed%2020%20February%202020 (Accessed: 10 August 2023).
Council of Europe (2023a) Abolition of the Death Penalty in Europe [Online]. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/abolition-death-penalty/abolition-of-deathpenalty-in-europe (Accessed: 5 July 2023).
Council of Europe (2023b) The 8th World Congress against the Death Penalty [Online]. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/abolition-death-penalty/-/the-8thworld-congress-against-the-death-penalty (Accessed: 5 July 2023).
Council of Europe (2023c) World and European Day against the Death Penalty [Online]. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/human-rights-rule-of-law/abolition (Accessed: 5 July 2023).
Council of Europe (2023d) Thematic Factsheet: Life Imprisonment [Online]. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/thematic-factsheet-life-imprisonment-eng/1680ab3b93 (Accessed: 16 June 2023).
Donohue, J.J., Wolfers, J. (2005) ‘Uses and Abuses of Empirical Evidence in the Death Penalty Debate’, Stanford Law Review, 58(3), pp. 791–845; http://www.jstor.org/stable/40040281.
Drenkhahn, K., Morgenstern, C. (2020) ‘Preventive Detention in Germany and Europe’ in Felthous, A.R., Saß, H. (eds.) The Wiley International Handbook on Psychopathic Disorders and the Law Vol. 2, 2nd edn. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 87–106; https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119159322.ch46.
ECPM (2023) About the Last World Congress in Berlin: Meeting Again, at Last [Online]. Available at: https://www.ecpm.org/en/our-actions/abolition-congresses/#aboutthe-last-world-congress-in-berlin-meeting-again-at-last (Accessed: 5 July 2023).
European Court of Human Rights (2022a) Factsheet – Death penalty abolition. Strasbourg: Council of Europe [Online]. Available at: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/FS_Death_penalty_ENG (Accessed: 11 June 2023).
European Court of Human Rights (2022b) Guide on Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights – Right to life, updated on 31 August 2022. Strasbourg: Council of Europe [Online]. Available at: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Guide_Art_2_ENG (Accessed: 11 June 2023).
European Court of Human Rights (2022c) Guide on the case-law of the European Convention on Human Rights – Prisoners’ rights, updated on 31 August 2022. Strasbourg: Council of Europe [Online]. Available at: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Guide_Prisoners_rights_ENG (Accessed: 11 June 2023).
Ferracuti, S., Pucci, D., Trobia, F., Alessi, M. C., Rapinesi, C., Kotzalidis, G. D., Del Casale, A. (2019) ‘Evolution of forensic psychiatry in Italy over the past 40 years (1978–2018)’, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 62 (1), pp. 45–49; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.10.003
Flanders, C. (2013) ‘The Case Against the Case Against the Death Penalty’, New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), pp. 595–620; https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2013.16.4.595.
Garland, D. (2022) ‘What Is Penal Populism? Public Opinion, Expert Knowledge, and Penal Policy-Formation in Democratic Societies’ in Liebling, A., Shapland, J., Sparks, R., Tankebe, J. (eds.) Crime, Justice, and Social Order: Essays in Honour of A. E. Bottoms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 249–272; https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192859600.003.0011.
Getoš Kalac, A.M. (2020) ‘Guilt, Dangerousness and Liability in the Era of Pre-Crime – the Role of Criminology? To Adapt, or to Die, that is the Question!’, Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 103(3), pp. 198–207; https://doi.org/10.1515/mks-2020-2054.
Getoš Kalac, A.M., Bezić, R., Šprem, P. (2021) ‘„Ružno pače“ hrvatskoga kaznenog pravosuđa – zatvorski sustav u svjetlu domaćih i europskih trendova’, Yearbook of the Croatian Academy of Legal Sciences, 12(1), pp. 83–112; https://doi.org/10.32984/gapzh.12.1.5.
Getoš Kalac, A.M., Feuerbach, L. (2023) ‘On (Measuring) Recidivism, Penal Populism and the Future of Recidivism Research: Neuropenology’, Yearbook of the Croatian Academy of Legal Sciences, 14(1), pp. 1–28; https://doi.org/10.32984/gapzh.14.1.1.
Holzapfel, A. (2023) ‘Darf Peter Vogt sterben?‘, Republik, 28.01.2023 [Online]. Available at: https://www.republik.ch/2023/01/28/darf-peter-vogt-sterben (Accessed: 2 July 2023).
Hood, R., Hoyle, C. (2008) The Death Penalty: A Worldwide Perspective, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228478.001.0001.
Hood, R., Hoyle, C. (2009) ‘Abolishing the Death Penalty Worldwide: The Impact of a “New Dynamic”, Crime and Justice, 38(1), pp. 1–63; https://doi.org/10.1086/599200.
Hörnquist, J.O. (1982) ‘The concept of quality of life’, Scandinavian journal of social medicine, 10(2), pp. 57–61; https://doi.org/10.1177/140349488201000204.
Jakobs, G. (2004) ‘Bürgerstrafrecht und Feindstrafrecht‘, HRRS HRR-Strafrecht Onlinezeitschrift für Höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung zum Strafrecht, 5(3), pp. 88–95 [Online]. Available at: https://www.hrr-strafrecht.de/hrr/archiv/04-03/hrrs-3-04.pdf (Accessed: 2 July 2023).
Kalvodová, V., Fryšták, M. (2022) ‘Czech Republic: National Regulations in the Shadow of a Common Past’ in Váradi-Csema, E. (ed.) Criminal Legal Studies. European Challenges and Central European Responses in the Criminal Science of the 21st Century. Miskolc–Budapest: Central European Academic Publishing. pp. 35–70; https://doi.org/10.54171/2022.evcs.cls_2.
Karajić, N. (1992) ‘Važnost pojedinih komponenata kvalitete života’, Socijalna ekologija: časopis za ekološku misao i sociologijska istraživanja okoline, 1(4), pp. 485–499 [Online]. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/204737 (Accessed: 11 August 2023).
Konferenz der Kantonalen Justiz- und Polizeidirektorinnen und -direktoren (2022) Stellungnahme der Konferenz der Kantonalen Justiz- und Polizeidirektorinnen und –direktoren (KKJPD) [Online]. Available at: https://www.nkvf.admin.ch/dam/nkvf/de/data/Berichte/2022/verwahrungsvollzug/stgn-kkjpd.pdf.download.pdf/stgn-kkjpd-d.pdf (Accessed: 2 July 2023).
Lappi-Seppälä, T. (2023) ‘Preventive detention in Finland and the other Nordic countries’, Peking University Law Journal, pp. 1–14 [Online]. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20517483.2023.2223847 (Accessed: 15 August 2023).
Ligthart, S., van Oploo, L., Meijers, J., Meynen, G., Kooijmans, T. (2019) ‘Prison and the brain: Neuropsychological research in the light of the European Convention on Human Rights’, New Journal of European Criminal Law, 10(3), pp. 287–300; https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284419861816.
Maslow, A. H. (2013) Toward a psychology of being. New York: Simon and Schuster.
National Commission for the Prevention of Torture (2022) Thematischer Schwerpunktbericht über die schweizweite Überprüfung der Grundrechtskonformität des Verwahrungsvollzugs (Art. 64 StGB) durch die Nationale Kommission zur Verhütung von Folter 2019–2021. Angenommen an der Plenarversammlung vom 8. Dezember 2021 [Online]. Available at: https://www.nkvf.admin.ch/dam/nkvf/de/data/Berichte/2022/verwahrungsvollzug/bericht-verwahrungsvollzug-2022.pdf.download.pdf/bericht-verwahrungsvollzug-2022-d.pdf (Accessed: 2 July 2023).
Network for the Abolition of the Death Penalty and Cruel Punishment (2022a) Abolition of the Death Penalty as a Peremptory Norm of General International Law (Jus Cogens) [online]. Available at: https://www.academicsforabolition.net/en/blog/abolition-of-the-death-penalty (Accessed: 22 June 2023).
Network for the Abolition of the Death Penalty and Cruel Punishment (2022b). International Congress against the Death Penalty [Online]. Available at: https://www.academicsforabolition.net/en/blog/international-congress-against-the-deathpenalty (Accessed: 1 August 2023).
Network for the Abolition of the Death Penalty and Cruel Punishment (2022c). Open books [Online]. Available at: https://www.academicsforabolition.net/en/materials/tipo-material/libros-en-abierto (Accessed: 1 August 2023).
Nordstrom, B.R., Gao, Y, Glenn, A.L., Peskin, M., Rudo-Hutt, A.S., Schug, R.A., Yang, Y., Raine, A. (2011) ‘Chapter 10 - Neurocriminology’ in Huber, R., Bannasch, D.L., Brennan, P. (eds.) Advances in Genetics Volume 75. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 255–283; https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-380858-5.00006-X.
Pardo, M.S., Patterson, D. (2013) Minds, Brains, and Law: The Conceptual Foundations of Law and Neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press; https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199812134.001.0001.
Przetacznik, F. (1976) ‘The Right to Life as a Basic Human Right’, Revue des Droits de L’Homme/ Human Rights Journal, 9(4), pp. 585–609.
Schabas, W.A. (2002) The Abolition of the Death Penalty in International Law, 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494109.
Schweizerisches Kompetenzzentrum für den Justizvollzug (2019) Grundlagenpapier: Der Assistierte Suizid im Straf- und Massnahmenvollzug [Online]. Available at: https://www.kkjpd.ch/newsreader/assistierter-suizid-im-straf-und-massnahmenvollzug.html (Accessed: 17 June 2023).
Short, C. (1999) ‘The Abolition of the Death Penalty: Does “Abolition” Really Mean What You Think It Means?’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 6(2), pp. 721–756.
Simon, J. (2014) ‘The cruelty of the abolitionists’, Journal of Human Rights Practice, 6(3), pp. 486–502; https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huu022.
Stearns, P.N. (ed.) (2020) The Routledge History of Death since 1800. London: Routledge; https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429028274.
Szwed, M. (2021) ‘The Polish model of civil post-conviction preventive detention in the light of the European Convention on Human Rights’, The International Journal of Human Rights, 25(10), pp. 1768–1792; https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2021.1874937.
Tober, T. (2019) Das Bundesverfassungsgericht und der US Supreme Court zur Sicherungsverwahrung gefährlicher, strafrechtlich verantwortlicher Straftäter: Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Umbach, R., Raine, A., Leonard, N.R. (2018) ‘Cognitive Decline as a Result of Incarceration and the Effects of a CBT/MT Intervention: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial’, Criminal justice and behavior, 45(1), pp. 31–55; https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817736345.
United Nations, Vienna (1994). Life Imprisonment [Online]. Available at: https://cdn.penalreform.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/UNODC-1994-Lifers.pdf (Accessed: 10 August 2023).
Universität Zürich Kompetenzzentrum Medizin – Ethik – Recht Helvetiae (2019) Suizidhilfe im Freiheitsentzug: Expertise zuhanden des Schweizerischen Kompetenzzentrums für den Justizvollzug [Online]. Available at: https://www.kkjpd.ch/newsreader/assistierter-suizid-im-straf-und-massnahmenvollzug.html (Accessed: 17 June 2023).
van Marle, H.J.C. (2002) ‘The Dutch Entrustment Act (TBS): Its Principles and Innovations’, International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, (1)1, pp. 83–92; https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2002.10471163.
van Zyl Smit D. (2006) ‘Life imprisonment: recent issues in national and international law’, International Journal Law Psychiatry, 29(5), pp. 405–21 [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.01.002.
van Zyl Smit, D (2002) ‘Taking Life Imprisonment Seriously?’ in van Zyl Smit D. (ed.) Taking Life Imprisonment Seriously. Brill Nijhoff. pp. 197-217; https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047403098_009.
van Zyl Smit, D., and Appleton, C. (eds.) (2019) Life imprisonment: A global human rights analysis. Harvard University Press.
van Zyl Smit, D., Appleton, C. (2019a) ‘Debating Life’ in van Zyl Smit D., Appleton, C. (eds.) Life Imprisonment: A Global Human Rights Analysis. United States of America. Harvard University Press, pp. 1-35. [Online]. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvckq60v.4 (Accessed: 17 August 2023).
van Zyl Smit, D., and Appleton, C. (2019b) ‘Prevalence of Life’ in van Zyl Smit D., Appleton, C. (eds.) Life Imprisonment: A Global Human Rights Analysis. United States of America. Harvard University Press, pp. 86-103 [Online]. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvckq60v.6 (Accessed: 17 August 2023).
van Zyl Smit, D., and Appleton, C. (2019c) ‘Life after Life’ in van Zyl Smit D., Appleton, C. (eds.) Life Imprisonment: A Global Human Rights Analysis. United States of America. Harvard University Press, pp. 274–296 [Online]. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvckq60v.13 (Accessed: 17 August 2023).
Weiss, E.B. (ed.) (1992) Environmental Change and International Law: New Challenges and Dimensions. Tokyo: United Nations University Press [Online]. Available at: https://archive.unu.edu/unupress/unupbooks/uu25ee/uu25ee0p.htm (Accessed: 17 June 2023).
Zedner, L., Ashworth, A.J. (2019) ‘The Rise and Restraint of the Preventive State’, Annual Review of Criminology, Vol. 2, pp. 429–450; https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024526.
ZüriToday (2023) Erstmals in der Schweiz: Verwahrter scheidet mit Exit aus dem Leben. [Online]. Available at: https://www.zueritoday.ch/schweiz/erstmals-inder-schweiz-verwahrter-scheidet-mit-exit-aus-dem-leben-150440513 (Accessed: 16 June 2023).